Monday, August 22, 2016

The Tough Questions

My "tough" questions have changed over my lifetime but there has never been a single decade that remained unscathed by some intrepid question-asker posing a question that I don't have a clear answer for. 

My current "stumper" question is "Are you retired?"  Well....Hmm...hard to say... Depends how strictly you interpret the word "retirement".

Here's the thing about that particular question that trips me up.  Why do people feel the need to ask?  Do I look so old that there would be an assumption that I should be out of the workforce?  Are they fearful that I am going to be the one batshit crazy person that they might have to work with (because we all know that every office has at least one wackadoo co-worker in the mix) and they need know where NOT to apply?  Do I look unproductive, unkempt, or unhinged?

Whatever prompts the question, I am a bit at a loss as how to answer it. Logically, it should be an easy YES or a NO answer but in my case, it's more like SORT OF.

To get to the bottom of if I am retired from the workforce, I have to go back to my work history.  .Clearly one can't retire from something if one hasn't done something.

Way back in the the dark ages B.C. (before children)  I did, in fact, regularly obtain paid employment.  It was during this time that I worked in such glamorous jobs as accounts payable and keypunch operating.  I am pretty sure that there are people out there ...even to this day.. that assume the only reason I ever had children was to get out of having to work in those types of fascinating industries.   Well, that isn't entirely true.  BUT as luck would have it, I cheerfully  quit my job week #1 of my first pregnancy. Keypunch operating takes on a whole new level of difficulty when one is routinely vomiting. While I have worked in some offices that would just consider that multitasking, I was eager to get started enjoying a very extended duration of "ME" time so off I went.

For a few years,  I could reasonably pull out the mommy card while avoiding what would be considered anything resembling a career.  (NOTE: I LOVED being a stay home mom and not because it kept me out of the workforce...but because it is the best job EVER.)

 As most of my long time readers know, we moved 21 times as my husband climbed the corporate ladder which resulted in me finding "my place" in 21 new cities.  In most cases, upon arriving to a new city my first job was to set up our home, get the kids settled into schools and take care of all the business one takes care of to get assimilated to a new community. Those pesky things like finding doctors, dentists, dry cleaners and the DMV among all the other mundane connections one needs to live any given place.  BUT once these checklist items are settled, there comes a point that the nagging question arises "Now what should I be doing?" Back in the 1970s, I could pretty much look in the classified ads in the newspaper and find a job.  (Did I just lose you young ones?  Just to the days prior to the Internet, there was the non-digital approach to job hunting...available jobs were listed in the "Help Wanted" ads in the newspaper. Archaic, you say but it worked.)

I will tell you though, that while I was perfecting my skills of walking the tight rope between working and not working,  I was lucky that there were still a number of women that didn't work outside the home.  Sadly, as time progressed (in an totally non-progressive way) and there were less and less "stay-at-home" moms there came a point when asked if "I worked" anything less than an affirmative answer that had links to a paycheck, it was quickly becoming a very unpopular choice to stay at home.  Yes, it turns out that there are a lot of really "judgey" women out there that were intent on making other women's life choices into a debatable causes.(NOTE:  Again luckily for me, I married a superstar of a husband that seemed fine with me staying home and feathering our nest.)

Needless to say, there did come a time when the kids were a bit older that I really did need to go forth into the world of  crazy bosses and malicious co-workers.  Into my life there came a point, when I no longer could justify NOT having a J.O.B.... so back into the workforce, I W.E.N.T.

In the years between then and now, I have had a lot of jobs in a lot of cities.  Depending on what was available at the time we arrived in whatever community...some of the jobs I held were managing a bank, managing an unemployment office,  bought a franchise for 2 fast food chain restaurants,  I started a corporate training company, I've been a 911 operator and for a couple of years I sold Hershey chocolate products to retail stores. ...but I have circled several times back to selling real estate.

The thing about my on-again-off-again career as a Realtor is that it was dependent on what state we were living in at any given time and the laws that dictated the level of difficulty getting a real estate license.  I always went back into real estate when we lived in Kansas or Missouri as I carry licenses in those states already but I didn't in Iowa, Nebraska, Illinois or Texas because  (A.) getting a license just seemed to be a bigger pain in the @ss than I felt like dealing with at the time....OR (B.)  Something else presented itself that sounded interesting.

In my early years of real estate it was actually quite rewarding. Back then people depended more on real estate agents because they hadn't become experts in their own right by watching HGTV and looking around on the Internet (the Internet hadn't been born yet...just as some of you weren't.) Real estate listings were listed on sheets called "hot sheets" that were distributed to all the real estate offices in any given city.  This worked out really slick for agents as the consumers had no way to access what was for sale without going to a real estate office.  Ah the good old days when we were needed.

The other fun part of real estate is the "rolling the dice" if you were actually going to make any money. It was sort of like buying a lottery ticket and dreaming about what you would do with the money if you win.  You  hope for the big win while the economy is good and people are buying and selling homes because you know what goes around comes around.  Great years are invariably followed by a couple of years that your expenses will eat up any wisp of a profit.

Just for sake of enlightening the uninformed, real estate agents work strictly on commission.  You have to have a brokerage hold your license but you are considered self-employed.  Even though you are self-employed, your brokerage firm charges you various fees to use their name and they tell you how to dress and what kind of car to drive.  (They don't want you not to look less than successful while you go broke.) Brokers also take a percentage of any commission from a listing or a purchase.  Most real estate commissions are divided 4 ways, buyer's agent, buyer's broker, seller's agent and seller's broker.

The money train doesn't stop there.  There is continuing education to be completed, state registration fees, Real estate Board membership, E-key and keybox rentals, advertising, signs...and  on and on and on. 

This is where it gets tricky.   I do all of that in two states and according to them I am considered employed.   BUT here's the thing...a couple of years ago, I quit showing up at the office.  

I have visions of my broker, waking up each morning thinking. "Will today be the day that Cheryl P. shows up for work?"  Conversely, I worry, if I would actually come into the office, the poor man might have a heart attack.  Considering the proximity of where my office is to the nearest Level One Trauma Center, I am additionally fearful that he wouldn't get life saving help before rigor sets in.  Leaves me wondering if I shouldn't move to a brokerage firm closer to a good hospital. OR better yet, just let him continue wondering where I am.  I am rather content "just phoning it in" when I occasionally do anything close to what could be called work. 

Why did I lose my enthusiasm for a career that provided me with a decent income about every third year, you ask?   WELL...the answer is that collectively home sellers and home buyers went NUTS.

You might think I am exaggerating but I assure you I am not.  In the good old days when I first got my licenses, (mid 1980s) my big worry was worrying about whether a house I was listing or showing would smell like cigarette smoke or cat urine.  Today, I need to preview every house because I want to make sure the bongs and sex toys are put away and out of sight. (Frankly, the buyers might want me to have those items included in the sale and it's just making more paperwork for me.) Plus if there is a meth lab in a house, I need to make sure that has been disclosed on the Condition of Property Disclosure Form Section 12 line 186 and 187 regarding methamphetamine and  any controlled substances  EVER being present, used or manufactured within the property at any time in the history of the house.  Now while I am fairly certain (**cough, cough**) that anyone that has a meth lab will be totally truthful and do the right thing by filling in the disclosure so he/she can clue the would-be-buyer in on the fact they are going to have some serious health issues in their future, it might have just slipped their mind. 

I hope you aren't jumping to the conclusion that homes that have drug paraphernalia, sex toys laying about, or evidence a meth lab are in some way relegated to lower end housing.  Shame on you for being that narrow minded.  The one and only house, that I  ever showed that actually had a meth lab in it, had a very high-tech,  scientific grade lab built in the finished lower level with a Viking range and granite counter tops.  So while maybe the homeowners were lowlifes that is not to say they were low-income lowlifes.

So do you see my dilemma here?  Technically, I am still working.  I even go so far as to actually show property from time to time, if for no other reason than to substantiate the rental costs of my E-key but as far as going into the office to answer phones, or give anyone the illusion that I am interested in working full time (gawd forbid), don't think I am quite there yet. There might be a time that I will be inspired. That time will not be today.

Do you have any questions that are frequently asked that have no simple answer? 

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Olympics for Under-Achievers

Speaking of "under-achievers".... You may have noticed the lack of a post this week.  I am actually working on it but (excuses, excuses) due to lack of time, lagging enthusiasm and absence of inspiration, I have not managed to finish it yet.  Sooooo...with that being honor of the Rio Olympics I am imagining what sporting events  Crabby Pants would want to compete in.  Let's imagine how our "less than fit" non-team player,  would fare in non-traditional games.  We are, of course, assuming that they aren't giving out medals for cynicism, skepticism or sarcasm. She would surely take the gold in those categories.

Crabby is dressed for the Carnivale

Not as easy as it looks but she hopes to take the gold.

And Last but not least...

I will be posting a "real" post in a few days...

Monday, August 8, 2016

Oh, Baby!

 Last week I was reading some essays written by a woman that had her first child in 2002 when she was 46 years old.  I, on the other hand had my first child in 1973 when I was 21 years old. seems a whole lot of things have changed.  Doing the math, that mom is 5 whole years younger than me and for that, I might be a tad envious.   She probably was thinking how much better she was prepared by waiting longer to have her child. No doubt she was.  However, I see advantages to having children younger even if technology and the medical community didn't offer me all the advantages that are available today.

Just for starters, back then I got top billing.  At no point did husbands in the early 1970s say, "WE are pregnant!"  No, back in the old days, the person who had possession of the occupied uterus was the pregnant one and the other person was included as a secondary participant. OK, we might of said, "WE are expecting" as both of us were anticipating the arrival of a baby but we didn't say that we were both pregnant. 
Hormonal emotional outbursts are still available.

Now for all of you dads out there that think I am being exclusionary, I am merely pointing out the word usage here. I am not underestimating your contribution to the end result: the baby. Yeah, you did your part but I am still thinking that the women do the heavy lifting part of this scenario.

Now I know some of your have acted appropriately empathetic while we vomited every morning, saw our body balloon into an odd configuration that eclipsed our feet, and required us to pee every 10 minutes but I do draw the line when men equate passing a kidney stone as probably the same type of pain as childbirth.  Let me just say that unless that kidney stone was 8 and a half pounds you are full of s***. 

As I was saying...Even leading up to the baby's arrival, things have changed.  It used to be that the mommy-to-be had a couple of baby showers given by her friends and/or family.  Typically, these consisted of all girls chatting over white sheet cake about baby names, nursery decor and how sore their nipples were.  Lots of giggling over guessing if the baby would be a boy or a girl. (NOTE: Yes, back then we didn't get 3D pictures of our babies so we could see them sucking their thumbs and seeing their cute little faces.)
The debate rages on.

Fast forward to today...Couples baby showers evidently are a thing.   I actually haven't attended a coed baby shower so I am not sure how successful these are but I think I like the idea of the men having to play those stupid games.  Why should women-kind be the only one subjected to this type of punishment?

If it's any consolation,  it is my understanding that adult beverages do get served at couples baby showers.  Of course this would have to be the case.   I can't imagine that grown up couples that have put aside an evening out for a celebration would be on board to not  have access to a drink or two... or ten?
Of course, the pregnant couple is abstaining from drinking.  Don't even think about it dad...if you are saying "WE are pregnant" then WE are both on the wagon, aren't we?  But be aware.... You will be really be wanting some booze when the subject turns to "mucus plugs".  Don't say I didn't warn you.

Another noticeable difference between then and now is the delivery room.  Well, hell what am I saying?  Today there aren't delivery rooms.... there are birthing suites.

I know this is going to sound like the maternity equivalent of me saying I walked 10 miles uphill in the snow to school...but back in the 70's,  women in labor were placed in a curtained area similar to how most of today's outpatient surgery centers are set up. Labor was done in partitioned off areas and at the appropriate time we were wheeled to the delivery room.   (NOTE: If you have had a colonoscopy anytime lately you might be familiar with a curtain between you and the next person getting "prepped".  While it's all very clinical and impersonal, the job gets done.)

I don't remember if there was a TV in the corner but I was being thoroughly  entertained by the lady on the other side of the curtain that was morphing between comments about how she was dying and how her husband would never get the opportunity to get near her again.  As I recall, his comments and "toneage" implied that he was OK with that.

Fast forward to today. So compared to the old method of a separate labor area, then onto the delivery room, and then finally a hospital room, today there is a "birthing suite" that is a one stop shop.  When my daughter had her babies, I got to visit her suite.  Turns out that having babies can be a very spa like experience...well except for the labor pains part of it, I suppose.  Moms have a room with a big flat screen TV, a recliner, Jacuzzi tub and a fold out sofa for the co-participants that want to sleep over.   While the decor still is pretty "hospital chic" in style it is private and mommy and daddy can have the whole dang family involved if they choose to. I think everyone except the family dog is welcome and I wouldn't guarantee that Fido wouldn't be allowed under certain situations.

I personally was fine at not having a private suite  but upon the occasion of my first baby hospital stay, I was disappointed that once I departed the delivery room, the private maternity rooms were all occupied.  Yes, thoroughly bummed out as we had great insurance that was more than happy to accommodate me with a private room only to find out that August is a super busy month and that I would have a room mate.  My room mate, however, provided me with tons of entertainment.  She regularly called the "possible"  3 "daddies" and went on and on about how much the baby looked like each of them.  Two of the daddies came visiting and to her immeasurable relief (I am guessing)...not at the same time. I might add that I sensed that at least those two dads weren't as happy as one might expect about being a new daddy.

One more notable difference is the level of "full disclosure" on the part of moms today.  I have talked to a fair amount of women that allowed photography during the birth of their children.  I imagine all of that "memorabilia" made it's way to someones clever little scrapbook.  I am rather curious who gets the pleasure of seeing the pictures.  Is this something that comes out at Thanksgiving dinner? 

Back in the day, I considered myself  a "giver" to let the doctor and my husband be in the room.  Had I thought my husband was capable of delivering our daughter, I wouldn't have allowed the doctor as much access as he had to my lady parts.  As for way in hell.  I am fairly safe in saying that from a photographic perspective, that definitely isn't my best angle. for the lady that waited for her career and life to settle nicely into place for her and her hubby before having a baby at 46 and me being young and fairly naive at 21...I am thinking that I like my choice better.  Sure that woman that wrote the article is 5 years younger than me but she has a 14 year old to deal with.  I get to send my grandchildren back to their house at the end of the day.